Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.6 | 45.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 2.2 |
| -- | 2010-11-22 |
| 4.88 x 2.56 x 0.41 inches | 4.57 x 2.22 x 0.62 inches |
| 4.43 ounces | 5.39 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 3.2 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 144 pixels per inch | 180 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Single-Core 600 MHz processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Yes GPU | GPU |
| 7.56 | 6.84 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 153,6 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 2.02 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 3.20 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution |
| 5.17 | 5.17 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 3.4 | 2.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | 337 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Optimus M has an overall score of 45.6, which is a bit better than Celkon A64's 41.6 global score. LG Optimus M's body is heavier and extremely thicker than the Celkon A64. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG Optimus M has the older 2.2 version and Celkon A64 has Android 4.2.2.
LG Optimus M counts with a little sharper screen than Celkon A64, because although it has a lot smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 480 x 320px resolution, the LG Optimus M also counts with a just a bit greater display density. The Celkon A64 counts with a better performing processing unit than LG Optimus M, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores.
The LG Optimus M has a camera that is just as good as the camera in Celkon A64, although the LG Optimus M also has a lot higher resolution back facing camera. The Celkon A64 features a better storage to store more apps and games than LG Optimus M, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB, the Celkon A64 also has 524,29 MB internal storage capacity.
The LG Optimus M counts with a little better battery lifetime than Celkon A64, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity against 1400mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG Optimus M is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.