Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.88 x 2.56 x 0.41 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.43 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 144 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 150 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is way better than Celkon A64, having a overall score of 83.3 against 41.6. Galaxy S9's construction is much heavier but thinner than the Celkon A64. The Galaxy S9 has an incredibly better screen than Celkon A64, because it has a really bigger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a way greater count of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy S9 features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Celkon A64, because it has 63,49 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior processing unit than Celkon A64, because it has 3,75 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a superior battery lifetime than Celkon A64, because it has a 114 percent more battery size. Galaxy S9 has a lot better camera than Celkon A64, because it has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a bit more money than Celkon A64, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.