Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 41.6 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| 4.88 x 2.56 x 0.41 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.43 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 144 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.17 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a lot better than the Celkon A64, getting a general score of 78.2 against 41.6. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco M3 has an older 10 version and Celkon A64 has Android 4.2.2 version. Xiaomi Poco M3's design is notably heavier but just a bit thinner than Celkon A64.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better display than Celkon A64, because it has a lot larger display, much more pixels per screen inch and a much higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much greater hardware performance than Celkon A64, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Celkon A64, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much better camera than Celkon A64, because it has a much better resolution camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco M3 has a much longer battery performance than Celkon A64, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 1400mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi Poco M3 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.