Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.35 x 2.65 x 0.43 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 3.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 160 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has an overall score of 83.3, which is much better than Celkon A66's general score of 45.6. Galaxy S9's construction is much thinner but heavier than Celkon A66. The Galaxy S9 features a lot better hardware performance than Celkon A66, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much more vibrant display than Celkon A66, because it has a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution, a bigger screen and a way higher screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots a lot better photos and videos than Celkon A66, because it has a way higher 12 MP resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy S9 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Celkon A66, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB. The Galaxy S9 has a way better battery life than Celkon A66, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2000mAh.
Galaxy S9 is a bit more expensive than Celkon A66, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.