Search


Compare phones

Global Score
32.735.9
Basic Information
CelkonMotorola
--2009-06-23
4.72 x 2.44 x 0.51 inches3.46 x 2.52 x 0.70 inches
3.88 ounces4.97 ounces
$ 249.00$ 179.00
Display / Screen
3.5 inches2.5 inches
480 x 800 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
267 pixels per inch160 pixels per inch
Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.45.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
10.6
Camera
3.00 MP2.00 MP
5.064.73
GPRS and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIM, Dual SIMSIM
0.20.9
Battery Life
1450mAh Li-Ion Battery1170mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
500 hours standby time
6.7 hours talk time
366 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
3.22.8
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

Motorola Karma QA1 is a bit better than the Celkon A9, getting a 35.9 score against 32.7. Although it's the best phone in this review, Motorola Karma QA1's design is heavier and way thicker than the Celkon A9. The Celkon A9 counts with a much better screen than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a lot higher pixel count per inch in the display, a way better 800 x 480 resolution and a way bigger screen.

Celkon A9 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Karma QA1. The Celkon A9 and the Motorola Karma QA1 count with very similar CPUs, they have 0 cores. Celkon A9 takes a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.

The Celkon A9 counts with better battery life than Motorola Karma QA1, because it has 1450mAh of battery capacity instead of 1170mAh.

The Motorola Karma QA1 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.