Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 44.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Celkon | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-11-27 |
| 4.97 x 2.52 x 0.43 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Yellow | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.06 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has an overall score of 78.2, which is way better than the Celkon AR 40's general score of 44.9. Xiaomi Poco M3 is a somewhat thinner but extremely heavier phone than the Celkon AR 40. Both phones in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Poco M3 has an older 10 version and Celkon AR 40 has Android 4.2.2 version.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a better performing processing unit than Celkon AR 40, because it has 3,5 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a brighter display than Celkon AR 40, because it has a way larger display, a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot greater display density.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a very superior camera than Celkon AR 40, because it has a much more MP back-facing camera. The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Celkon AR 40, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Celkon AR 40, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Poco M3 is also the cheapest, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.