Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.1 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 Lollipop | Android 4.0 |
| 2016-06-07 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.70 x 2.81 x 0.43 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.74 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 854 x 480 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.16 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is a lot better than Coolpad Catalyst, with a 71.5 score against 52.1. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version while Coolpad Catalyst has Android 5.1 Lollipop. Galaxy S III Cricket's construction is lighter and way thinner than Coolpad Catalyst.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a lot better display than Coolpad Catalyst, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater pixel count per inch of screen and a much better 1280 x 720 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a little faster processor than Coolpad Catalyst, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with an extra GPU and 1 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Coolpad Catalyst, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 64 GB and 32 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket takes way better photographs and videos than Coolpad Catalyst, because it has a lot better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a way better 8 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Coolpad Catalyst features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Galaxy S III Cricket costs the same than the Coolpad Catalyst, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.