Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.52 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Silver | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SDM6125 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 32 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is much better than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, getting a overall score of 88.1 against 72.6. IPhone X is a somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa. Apple iPhone X has a little bit better performance than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone X has a sharper display than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit higher display pixel density. IPhone X features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a very superior camera than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition. The Coolpad Legacy Brisa counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2716mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.