Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SDM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 32 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa, with a 90.8 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is a bit heavier but a little thinner than Coolpad Legacy Brisa. The Galaxy Note 20 has a little sharper display than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 20 features just a little better processing power than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a lot better camera than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a camera in the back with much less MP, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.