Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.52 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Silver | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SDM6125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 32 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is slightly better than Coolpad Legacy Brisa's global score of 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a lighter and thinner cellphone than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version and Coolpad Legacy Brisa has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Note 5 features a sharper display than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per display inch. Coolpad Legacy Brisa counts with slightly more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB.
The Coolpad Legacy Brisa counts with a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 28 GB more RAM and 7 more processing cores (although slower). The Coolpad Legacy Brisa counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Galaxy Note 5 shoots way better pictures and videos than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 16 megapixels resolution, the Galaxy Note 5 also has a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.