Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.52 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Silver | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SDM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 32 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 has a global score of 80.2, which is much better than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa's 72.6 overall score. The Galaxy Note5 is a somewhat lighter and thinner device than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa. Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit sharper screen than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Coolpad Legacy Brisa counts with slightly more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note5, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. Coolpad Legacy Brisa has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Coolpad Legacy Brisa also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Coolpad Legacy Brisa has improved battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Galaxy Note5 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note5 also has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.