Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.52 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SDM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 32 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa's overall score of 72.6. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Coolpad Legacy Brisa has Android 10, so it provides a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Although it's the best device we are comparing, Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is heavier and just a bit thicker than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a better display density. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior memory for games and applications than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Coolpad Legacy Brisa has a bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Coolpad Legacy Brisa also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery lifetime than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.