Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.52 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Silver | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SDM6125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 32 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is much better than Coolpad Legacy Brisa's general score of 72.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version and Coolpad Legacy Brisa has Android 10 version, counting with some nice extra features. Although it's the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a slightly better screen than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bit better pixels number per display inch. The Coolpad Legacy Brisa features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Coolpad Legacy Brisa also has more RAM.
The Galaxy XCover Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a back camera with a way higher 25 MP resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has a 1 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.