Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Coolpad | Xiaomi |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.52 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Silver | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SDM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 32 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.25 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is much better than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa's global score of 72.6. Even being the best in our current comparison, Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's construction is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier than the Coolpad Legacy Brisa. These phones include the same Android 10 operating system.
The Coolpad Legacy Brisa and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro count with extremely similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much greater storage to install games and applications than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
Coolpad Legacy Brisa has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Coolpad Legacy Brisa also has 26 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Coolpad Legacy Brisa, because it has a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.