Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 24.4 | 32.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cricket | LG |
| -- | 2006-04-05 |
| 4.04 x 1.71 x 0.63 inches | 3.36 x 1.89 x 0.90 inches |
| 2.47 ounces | 3.27 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| STN | STN |
| 91 pixels per inch | 165 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 5.9 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 229 hours standby time 2 hours talk time | 240 hours standby time 6 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.56 |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
LG CG225 has a global score of 32.2, which is a lot better than the Cricket EZ's global score of 24.4. The LG CG225 construction is much heavier and thicker than Cricket EZ. LG CG225 has a much better looking screen than Cricket EZ, and although they both have the same 128 x 128 pixels resolution, the LG CG225 also has a way higher pixel count per inch of display.
LG CG225 and Cricket EZ both feature extremely similar CPUs, they have the same number of cores. The LG CG225 and Cricket EZ have similar storage capacity for games and applications. LG CG225 features longer battery life than Cricket EZ, because it has a 25% more battery capacity. LG CG225 counts with a much better camera than Cricket EZ.
The LG CG225 costs the same than the Cricket EZ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.