Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.4 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cricket | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-07-18 |
| 4.04 x 1.71 x 0.63 inches | 3.46 x 2.00 x 1.02 inches |
| 2.47 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 130 x 130 pixels |
| STN | TFT |
| 91 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | -- |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 229 hours standby time 2 hours talk time | 130 hours standby time 2.8 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.16 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola i670 is slightly better than the Cricket EZ, with a global score of 24.5 against 24.4. Motorola i670's construction is way thicker and a lot heavier than Cricket EZ. Cricket EZ features a much better screen than Motorola i670, although it has a quite lower resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
The Motorola i670's processing unit is very similar to the Cricket EZ one, they have a 0-Core CPU. Motorola i670 has as much storage capacity for games and applications as the Cricket EZ one. The Cricket EZ features just a little better battery duration than Motorola i670, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
The Motorola i670's camera is just as good as Cricket EZ's camera.
The Motorola i670 costs the same than Cricket EZ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.