Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.441.9
Basic Information
CricketNokia
--Symbian 9.3
--2009-02-10
4.04 x 1.71 x 0.63 inches4.41 x 1.81 x 0.47 inches
2.47 ounces2.93 ounces
$ 35.00$ 35.00
Display / Screen
--2.2 inches
128 x 128 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
91 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
56.5
processorARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.75
Storage
--61,44 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.5
Camera
--3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
CDMAHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.13.5
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
229 hours standby time
2 hours talk time
400 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
2.242.32
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--

Comparison review

The Nokia 5630 XpressMusic is much better than Cricket EZ, getting a 41.9 score against 24.4. Nokia 5630 XpressMusic is a extremely thinner but somewhat heavier phone than the Cricket EZ. Nokia 5630 XpressMusic has a much more vibrant screen than Cricket EZ, because it has a much better pixel density and a lot better 320 x 240px resolution.

The Nokia 5630 XpressMusic counts with a more powerful processing unit than Cricket EZ, because it has a larger number of cores. Nokia 5630 XpressMusic counts with a way better camera than Cricket EZ. The Nokia 5630 XpressMusic has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Cricket EZ, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 16 GB.

Nokia 5630 XpressMusic counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Cricket EZ, because it has an 8 percent greater battery size.

Nokia 5630 XpressMusic and the Cricket EZ cost exactly the same, making this phone a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.