Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.4 | 35.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Cricket | Nokia |
| -- | Symbian 9.2 |
| -- | 2006-11-28 |
| 4.04 x 1.71 x 0.63 inches | 3.70 x 1.96 x 0.82 inches |
| 2.47 ounces | 4.05 ounces |
| $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.2 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| STN | TFT |
| 91 pixels per inch | 182 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 6.5 |
| processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor |
| -- | 64 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 51,2 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| CDMA | UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 950mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 229 hours standby time 2 hours talk time | 264 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
Comparison review
Nokia 6290 is much better than Cricket EZ, having a 35.1 score against 24.4. Despite being the best device in this review, the Nokia 6290 construction is noticeably thicker and incredibly heavier than Cricket EZ. The Nokia 6290 counts with a bit better performance than Cricket EZ, because it has a greater number of cores.
Nokia 6290 features an incredibly better display than Cricket EZ, because it has a lot higher pixels amount per display inch and a lot better resolution of 320 x 240. The Nokia 6290 features a much better camera than Cricket EZ. The Nokia 6290 features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Cricket EZ.
Nokia 6290 features better battery lifetime than Cricket EZ, because it has a 950mAh battery capacity against 800mAh.
The Nokia 6290 and the Cricket EZ cost exactly the same, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.