Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.435.1
Basic Information
CricketNokia
--Symbian 9.2
--2006-11-28
4.04 x 1.71 x 0.63 inches3.70 x 1.96 x 0.82 inches
2.47 ounces4.05 ounces
$ 35.00$ 35.00
Display / Screen
--2.2 inches
128 x 128 pixels 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
STNTFT
91 pixels per inch182 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
56.5
processorARM11 (Single-Core 369 MHz) processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.3
Storage
--51,2 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD external memory slot
00.4
Camera
--2.00 MP
04.73
CDMAUMTS, EDGE and GSM
--SIM
0.10.4
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery950mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
229 hours standby time
2 hours talk time
264 hours standby time
3.5 hours talk time
2.242.48
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
GPS--
--Infra-red port

Comparison review

Nokia 6290 is much better than Cricket EZ, having a 35.1 score against 24.4. Despite being the best device in this review, the Nokia 6290 construction is noticeably thicker and incredibly heavier than Cricket EZ. The Nokia 6290 counts with a bit better performance than Cricket EZ, because it has a greater number of cores.

Nokia 6290 features an incredibly better display than Cricket EZ, because it has a lot higher pixels amount per display inch and a lot better resolution of 320 x 240. The Nokia 6290 features a much better camera than Cricket EZ. The Nokia 6290 features a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Cricket EZ.

Nokia 6290 features better battery lifetime than Cricket EZ, because it has a 950mAh battery capacity against 800mAh.

The Nokia 6290 and the Cricket EZ cost exactly the same, which makes it a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.