Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.43 x 2.36 x 0.51 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6731 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1100 MHz processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8100 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.82 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 5.5 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 2.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1600mAh Micro SIM Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a general score of 90.6, which is much better than Doro 780X's general score of 76.1. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 design is way heavier but extremely thinner than Doro 780X. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has just a little better performance than Doro 780X, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an incredibly better looking screen than Doro 780X, because it has a much better 1768 x 2208 resolution, a lot larger screen and a much better display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way better camera than Doro 780X, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Doro 780X, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a really longer battery performance than Doro 780X, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 1600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.