Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 21.9 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Ericsson | Nokia |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-14 |
| 5.11 x 1.96 x 0.62 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 3.75 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| -- | White |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 70.00 | $ 70.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| -- | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| -- | 2 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 5.76 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 0 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 0.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 3.1 C is a lot better than the Ericsson R520m, getting a 64.8 score against 21.9. The Nokia 3.1 C body is heavier but notably thinner than the Ericsson R520m. Nokia 3.1 C features an incredibly better looking screen than Ericsson R520m. The Nokia 3.1 C features a lot better hardware performance than Ericsson R520m, because it has a higher number of cores.
The Nokia 3.1 C features a very superior storage for games and applications than Ericsson R520m, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 128 GB. The Nokia 3.1 C shoots way better photographs and videos than Ericsson R520m. The Nokia 3.1 C features a superior battery performance than Ericsson R520m, because it has a 299% bigger battery size.
Nokia 3.1 C and the Ericsson R520m cost the same, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.