Search


Compare phones

Ericsson R520m
Global Score
21.943.5
Basic Information
EricssonNokia
--2012-02-27
5.11 x 1.96 x 0.62 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
3.75 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
--320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.76.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
--3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
GPRS and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.23.6
Battery Life
750mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
200 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.163.2
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

The Nokia Asha 302 is way better than Ericsson R520m, having a 43.5 score against 21.9. Nokia Asha 302's body is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Ericsson R520m. The Nokia Asha 302 has a lot better looking display than Ericsson R520m. The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Ericsson R520m, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 32 GB.

The Nokia Asha 302 features a very superior hardware performance than Ericsson R520m, because it has a greater number of cores. Nokia Asha 302 shoots way better photos and videos than Ericsson R520m. Nokia Asha 302 features a way better battery life than Ericsson R520m, because it has 1430mAh of battery capacity against 750mAh.

Nokia Asha 302 and the Ericsson R520m cost the same, which makes this phone a very good choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.