Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.3 | 72.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-08-17 | 2020-06-02 |
| 5.57 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and White | Arctic white and Glacier blue |
| Ceramic and Titanium | Glass and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 464.00 | $ 380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1312 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 505 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3040mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.04 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Realme X3 SuperZoom is a bit better than the Essential Phone, having a 72.6 score against 66.3. The realme X3 SuperZoom is a much newer cellphone than Essential Phone, although it is a little bit heavier and thicker. Essential Phone counts with just a bit better looking display than realme X3 SuperZoom, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a slightly higher 1312 x 2560 resolution.
Realme X3 SuperZoom has a little better processing power than Essential Phone, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has a larger amount of RAM. Realme X3 SuperZoom's storage capacity for applications and games is very similar to the Essential Phone one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage.
Realme X3 SuperZoom counts with a very superior battery life than Essential Phone, because it has a 38% bigger battery size. Realme X3 SuperZoom takes a lot better videos and photos than Essential Phone, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the realme X3 SuperZoom also has faster video frame rate, a much more megapixels camera in the back, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and a much bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, realme X3 SuperZoom is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.