Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Firefly | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| 3.46 x 1.75 x 0.79 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 2.12 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 150.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 96 x 68 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| 186 pixels per inch | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.7 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 205 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 is just a bit better than Firefly Mobile Firefly Phone, with a score of 26 against 24. The Nokia 1600 is a thinner but notably heavier cellphone than Firefly Mobile Firefly Phone. Firefly Mobile Firefly Phone counts with an incredibly better display than Nokia 1600, because it has a lot better count of pixels per screen inch.
The Nokia 1600's processing unit is very similar to Firefly Mobile Firefly Phone's processing unit, they have a 0-Core processing unit. Nokia 1600's memory to install games and applications is just as good as Firefly Mobile Firefly Phone's one. Nokia 1600 and Firefly Mobile Firefly Phone have extremely similar cameras.
Nokia 1600 has a much longer battery performance than Firefly Mobile Firefly Phone.
The Nokia 1600 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.