Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.7 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Garmin | Samsung |
| Android 2.1, 1.6 | -- |
| 2010-02-11 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.57 x 2.46 x 0.49 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.84 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (30 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 600 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a lot better than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50's 40.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 design is way newer and incredibly thinner than the Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50's, but it's somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A50 counts with an incredibly better display than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a lot bigger display and a lot higher screen density.
The Galaxy A50 has a much greater processing power than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has 3,75 GB more RAM and more processing cores. Samsung Galaxy A50 takes way better pictures and videos than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has a much better video resolution and a camera in the back with a way higher 25 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A50 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A50 has a much better battery lifetime than Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than the Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.