Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.35 x 2.64 x 0.49 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.21 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 333 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is much better than the GIGABYTE GSmart Aku A1's general score of 46.6. The Galaxy S7 design is incredibly thinner but just a bit heavier than the GIGABYTE GSmart Aku A1. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features a bit more powerful CPU than GIGABYTE GSmart Aku A1, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S7 also counts with a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 features a much sharper screen than GIGABYTE GSmart Aku A1, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels, a little bit bigger display and a lot better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy S7 captures much clearer photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Aku A1, because it has a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy S7 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than GIGABYTE GSmart Aku A1, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 200 GB. The Galaxy S7 features a very superior battery duration than GIGABYTE GSmart Aku A1, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S7 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the GIGABYTE GSmart Aku A1.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.