Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.3 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Motorola |
| -- | 2008-01-07 |
| -- | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| -- | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 114 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE and GPRS | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.48 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W270 is a little bit better than GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2, having a 25.6 score against 24.3. GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2 features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola W270. The Motorola W270 and GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2 count with quite similar processors, both have a 0-Core processing unit.
The Motorola W270 has as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2 one. Motorola W270's camera is very similar to GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2's camera. The Motorola W270 counts with a much better battery duration than GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2.
Motorola W270 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.