Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.3 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Gigabyte | Nokia |
| -- | 2005-06-03 |
| -- | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| -- | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 155.00 | $ 100.00 |
| -- | 96 x 68 pixels |
| 114 pixels per inch | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE and GPRS | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 1.4 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 2.4 |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 has a global score of 26, which is a bit better than the GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2's 24.3 overall score. The GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 1600, because it has a much higher display pixels density. The Nokia 1600's storage for apps and games is very similar to the GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2 one.
Nokia 1600's processor is just as good as GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2's CPU, they have the same number of cores. GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2 and Nokia 1600 both count with extremely similar cameras. The Nokia 1600 features a much better battery performance than GIGABYTE GSmart Roma R2.
The Nokia 1600 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.