Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2015-10-20 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 ThinQ has a score of 81, which is a bit better than the Google Nexus 5X's overall score of 73.7. LG G7 ThinQ's construction has the same thickness than the Google Nexus 5X, but it is somewhat heavier. The LG G7 ThinQ features a sharper display than Google Nexus 5X, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a bigger screen.
The LG G7 ThinQ has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 2 more cores and more RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has a way smaller sensor taking lot worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a larger aperture and better video frame rate.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. LG G7 ThinQ features a bit longer battery life than Google Nexus 5X, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
LG G7 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.