Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2015-10-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is much better than the Google Nexus 5X's overall score of 73.7. Even though the LG V35 ThinQ is somewhat heavier than the Google Nexus 5X, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a faster CPU than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a larger display and a greater pixel number in each inch in the screen. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ features improved battery performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery size. The LG V35 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has a much smaller back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 16 MP resolution and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and video.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V35 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.