Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is better than Google Nexus 5X's 73.7 score. LG V60 ThinQ's body is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than Google Nexus 5X. The LG V60 ThinQ has a better hardware performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a higher number of cores and 6 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 5X and the LG V60 ThinQ have incredibly similar screens, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit inferior number of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a really larger screen. The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ features a really longer battery duration than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. LG V60 ThinQ captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V60 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.