Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than Google Nexus 5X's score of 73.7. The Galaxy A70 is a extremely heavier cellphone than the Google Nexus 5X, but both have the same thickness. Google Nexus 5X features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a bit better pixels density.
Galaxy A70 has a little faster processing unit than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 2 more CPU cores and more RAM memory. Galaxy A70 features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much better battery life than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. Google Nexus 5X shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Nexus 5X also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A70 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.