Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Google Nexus 5X, with a general score of 97.6 against 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a notably newer and thinner cellphone than the Google Nexus 5X, although it's notably heavier. Google Nexus 5X counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller display and a much lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite better pixels density.
Galaxy Fold counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 480 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold has a superior processing unit than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a larger number of cores and 10 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality videos and photos and a lesser megapixels back camera, it also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold costs a lot more money than Google Nexus 5X, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.