Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2015-10-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a bit better than Google Nexus 5X, having a general score of 78.9 against 73.7. The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a extremely newer phone than the Google Nexus 5X, although it's much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy M20 features a little better processing power than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a larger number of 1800 megahertz cores and more RAM.
The Google Nexus 5X has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. The Google Nexus 5X counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.3 mega-pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. Galaxy M20 features a much longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.