Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Google Nexus 5X, with a 98.9 score against 73.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's body is incredibly newer than the Google Nexus 5X's, although it's extremely heavier and just a little thicker. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a little bit better display than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a much larger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit greater number of pixels in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a larger aperture for better images and video in low light environments, a back-facing camera with much more MP, a much larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior memory for apps and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better battery life than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more money than the Google Nexus 5X, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.