Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a global score of 77.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 5X's 73.7 overall score. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note3's design is extremely older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than Google Nexus 5X. Google Nexus 5X counts with a bit better display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, the Google Nexus 5X also counts with a little bit greater screen density.
Galaxy Note3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note3 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB.
Google Nexus 5X features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a lower video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Galaxy Note3 features better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.