Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-20 | -- |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 4.80 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is much better than Google Nexus 5X's score of 73.7. Galaxy S25 is a noticeably lighter and way thinner device than the Google Nexus 5X. Galaxy S25 has a sharper screen than Google Nexus 5X, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Nexus 5X has a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 2 lesser CPU cores (but faster) and 6 GB less RAM. Galaxy S25 features a way better battery performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
The Galaxy S25 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with much more MP, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Galaxy S25 costs a lot more than the Google Nexus 5X, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.