Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than the Google Nexus 5X's score of 73.7. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a way newer cellphone than Google Nexus 5X, but it's extremely heavier and much thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a display that is just as good as Google Nexus 5X's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a just a little lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 5X, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little better performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a greater number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a camera that is very similar to the Google Nexus 5X one, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a way tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Google Nexus 5X, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.