Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-20 | -- |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 5X, having a global score of 77.1 against 73.7. Despite being the best device in this review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G design is just a little thicker and heavier than Google Nexus 5X. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a sharper display than Google Nexus 5X, because it has a bigger screen, a much higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen.
Google Nexus 5X counts with a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a greater camera than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.