Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-10-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.79 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.80 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 429.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a general score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 5X's 73.7 general score. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's body is extremely newer than Google Nexus 5X's, although it is thicker and notably heavier. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 5X, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Google Nexus 5X features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel amount per screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Google Nexus 5X, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Google Nexus 5X, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a camera with way more megapixels, a much larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Google Nexus 5X, because it has an 86% greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.