Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XR has an overall score of 82, which is just a bit better than the Google Nexus 6's 81.1 global score. Apple iPhone XR's design is much newer and thinner, but just a little heavier than Google Nexus 6. The Google Nexus 6 counts with a bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way better screen density.
Apple iPhone XR and Google Nexus 6 have quite similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have equal internal storage. IPhone XR has a little bit better performance than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the iPhone XR also counts with a greater number of cores and a 64-bit processing unit.
The Google Nexus 6 features just a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XR, because it has 3220mAh of battery capacity instead of 2942mAh. The iPhone XR has a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower video definition and a lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone XR is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.