Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6, having an 82.5 score against 81.1. Google Pixel 2 XL is a incredibly newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and way thinner than the Google Nexus 6. Google Nexus 6 has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Google Nexus 6 features a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it has a quite lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit worse pixels density, they both have a display of the same size. The Google Pixel 2 XL has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 64 GB more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lesser MP camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures in low-light situations. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a little longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.