Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6's global score of 81.1. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is incredibly newer and thinner than Google Nexus 6's, although it is a little heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
Google Nexus 6 has a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display, a little worse 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit smaller display. Google Pixel 4 XL captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower video quality and a back facing camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations.
Google Nexus 6 and Google Pixel 4 XL have really similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have the same 64 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4 XL has just a little better battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Google Pixel 4 XL is also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.