Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Blue and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 490 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than the Google Nexus 6, getting a general score of 92.1 against 81.1. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner than Google Nexus 6's, although it is also extremely heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has 14 version and Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better looking display than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a just a little worse amount of pixels per display inch and a quite lower resolution of 1280 x 2800px, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 1 TB internal memory.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a bit better processor than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes greater videos and photos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a lot larger aperture, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a very superior battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 5600mAh battery size.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is more expensive than Google Nexus 6, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.