Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having an 81.1 score against 77.4. Google Nexus 6's body is noticeably older, thicker and extremely heavier than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Google Nexus 6 has a bit better CPU than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Google Nexus 6 features a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a little bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, and they both have an equal 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a little bit larger display. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Nexus 6, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a less mega-pixels resolution back camera, they both have the same aperture. Google Nexus 6 has superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 3220mAh battery capacity.
The Google Nexus 6 costs more than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.