Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 is just a bit better than the Motorola One Action, with a general score of 81.1 against 78.5. The Google Nexus 6 body is older, somewhat thicker and just a little heavier than the Motorola One Action. Google Nexus 6 counts with a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and 4 lesser cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Google Nexus 6 has just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. Motorola One Action has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One Action has just a bit better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos. The Motorola One Action has a little longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 9% greater battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Google Nexus 6, else you can save some money and get the Motorola One Action, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.