Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has a global score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Hyper's global score of 79.8. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Google Nexus 6 has an older 5.1 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. The Google Nexus 6 is a incredibly older and thicker phone than the Motorola One Hyper, but Google was able to build it just a little lighter anyway.
The Google Nexus 6 has a sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a quite better pixels density. Google Nexus 6 has just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola One Hyper features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One Hyper also has a lot better resolution camera and a larger aperture.
Motorola One Hyper has superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Google Nexus 6, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola One Hyper, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.