Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6, getting a general score of 87 against 81.1. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has the newer 11 version and Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1. Motorola razr (2020)'s design is newer and thinner, but a little bit heavier than Google Nexus 6.
Google Nexus 6 has a sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. The Google Nexus 6 has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a GPU.
Motorola razr (2020) has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) has a much better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video.
Google Nexus 6 has just a bit better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3220mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
The Motorola razr (2020) costs more than Google Nexus 6, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.