Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue and White | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 is just a bit better than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, having a general score of 81.1 against 80.3. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but Google Nexus 6 has an older 5.1 version and Nokia 8 V 5G UW has Android 10. Google Nexus 6's body is lighter than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, but it's somewhat thicker and was released 6 years before.
The Google Nexus 6 features a better looking screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
Google Nexus 6 has a little bit better processing power than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a very superior camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Nokia 8 V 5G UW. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.