Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 490 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a general score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's 77 overall score. Despite being the best cellphone in this review, Google Nexus 6's body is incredibly older, thicker and a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A20s. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Google Nexus 6 has older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11 version.
The Google Nexus 6 features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater number of pixels per inch of display and a much higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A20s has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A20s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Google Nexus 6 captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A20s has superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 24 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.