Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Google Nexus 6's general score of 81.1. The Galaxy A50 construction is much newer, way thinner and a bit lighter than Google Nexus 6. Google Nexus 6 counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy A50, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Google Nexus 6 has a better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. The Galaxy A50 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also has a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low-light environments and a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has greater battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.